-Amebiasis - Over the past 12-month period (April 2011 through March 2012), the number of amebiasis infections reported to public health was higher than expected based on the five year average for this same time period (15 cases vs. 8 cases expected). For more information about amebiasis, click here.
-Botulism - Over the past 12-month period (April 2011 through March 2012), the number of botulism infections reported to public health was higher than expected based on the five year average for this same time period (11 cases vs. 3 cases expected). For more information about botulism, click here.
-Brucellosis - Over the past 12-month period (April 2011 through March 2012), the number of brucellosis infections reported to public health was higher than expected based on the five year average for this same time period (3 cases vs. 0.2 cases expected). For more information about brucellosis, click here.
-Echinococcosis - Over the past 12-month period (April 2011 through March 2012), the number of echinococcosis infections reported to public health was higher than expected based on the five year average for this
same time period
(1 case vs. 0 cases expected). For more information about echinococcosis,
click here.
-Norovirus - Over the past 12-month period (April 2011 through March 2012), the number of norovirus infections reported to public health was higher than expected based on the five year average for this
same time period (73 cases vs. 26.2 cases expected). For more information about norovirus, click here.
-Pertussis - Over the past 12-month period (April 2011 through March 2012), the number of pertussis infections reported to public health was higher than expected based on the five year average for this
same time period (615 cases vs. 342 cases expected). For more information about pertussis, click here.
-Rubella - Over the past 12-month period (April 2011 through March 2012), the number of rubella infections reported to public health was higher than expected based on the five year average for this
same time period (2 cases vs. 0 cases expected). For more information about rubella, click here.