|
Salmonella
. . . Just Another Gastric Monstrosity!
It was an
unusually cold and rainy summers day in June when a large
Salt Lake County employer held a book fair for their employees
children. The young ones probably ran up to the ice cream vendor
to get their pick between chocolate, strawberry, or vanilla
Italian gelato. Consequently, many of the events attendees
were running off to the doctor in the days that followed, complaining
of severe diarrhea, abdominal pain, and fever.
The Bureau of Epidemiology received a phone
call from a Davis County resident claiming dozens of his co-workers
and their children became ill after attending the book fair.
Laboratory testing confirmed the presence of Salmonella enteritidis
(SE) in the cases stool samples.
A case control study was not conducted because
of the overwhelmingly significant positive association between
illness and eating the Italian gelato (Italian ice-cream), the
only food item served at the event. As a result of these findings,
a separate investigation was undertaken to determine how the
gelato may have been contaminated. An environmental health officer
in Utah County conducted an interview with the caterer, whose
establishment resides in that county. It was discovered that
when the supply of pasteurized eggs was depleted while making
the gelato, one of the employees completed the recipe using
shelled eggs purchased at a nearby grocery store. Gelato samples
provided by the caterer were submitted for laboratory testing
but were found to be negative for SE contamination. However,
the astounding numbers of symptomatic people (more than 250
individuals) and nearly 60 confirmed SE cases who attended the
event, left little room for doubt as to the source of contamination.
Further investigation was undertaken to determine
the source of the shelled eggs used by the caterer. The eggs
were purchased by the caterer at a local grocery store, who
received the product from an egg cooperative. Though the egg
cooperative receives eggs from several out-of-state as well
as in-state farms, the dates that the various farms supplied
eggs led investigators to narrow the list down to three Utah
farms and one out-of-state farm. The Utah Department of Agriculture
and Food is currently working with the Utah farms to test for
the presence of SE.
A number of recommendations have been made
based upon the findings of this SE investigation, including:
In commercial kitchens, pasteurized egg products should be used
for all items requiring pooled eggs or raw eggs.
Traceback of eggs implicated in SE outbreaks
should be conducted to the individual farm level. If a farm
is found to be infected with SE, appropriate control measures
should be implemented immediately. In addition, an effort
should be made to determine the method by which SE was introduced
into the farm ecosystem in order to prevent future propagation
of the contaminant.
Commercial food establishments should work
to identify and eliminate practices conducive to cross-contamination.
There were two other clusters of Utah residents
running off to the doctor during the month of June, also exhibiting
diarrheal illnesses. Laboratory testing confirmed the presence
of S. typhimurium (ST) and S. muenchen (SM) in
these cases. One cluster of ST matched a strain (through PFGE
analysis) associated with the consumption of alfalfa/clover
sprouts. The remaining SM cases matched a strain associated
with unpasteurized orange juice contaminated with the bacteria.
On Friday, May 28, 1999 the Bureau of Epidemiology
was contacted by an EIS officer from the CDCs Foodborne
Disease Division about four Utah residents diagnosed with ST.
The bacteria isolated from these four cases had a PFGE pattern
that was the same as that from 79 cases that were being investigated
in Colorado. During the weeks that followed, three additional
ST cases were identified with the same PFGE pattern. Preliminary
case-control studies conducted in Colorado suggested that consumption
of alfalfa/clover sprouts was associated with the disease. Five
of the seven cases completed interviews with epidemiologists
who inquired about the consumption and/or handling of sprouts.
Despite the matching pattern among the seven cases, only two
of them reported eating sprouts including an individual who
grew alfalfa sprouts at his residence.
The CDC indicated that the implicated lot of
clover sprouts originally came from an Oregon sprouter. This
lot was then sold to distributors in Oklahoma and Kentucky.
The lot was produced in November 1998 and shipped in January
and February 1999. The Utah Department of Healths Bureau
of Epidemiology was particularly interested in the source of
the seeds used in the home-grown sprouts, hoping to find a connection
with the Oregon sprouter. A traceback including suppliers, distributors,
sellers, and growers indicated this lot of seeds was originally
shipped in June of 1998. The seeds were all purchased from local
growers in South Dakota. From the series of phone calls, investigators
learned that it was unlikely that the individual case who enjoyed
home-grown sprouts became ill from them. The other case, whose
PFGE pattern matched the outbreak strain, could not identify
her exact date of onset due to complications from a chronic
gastrointestinal disease. Although she consumes sprouts frequently
from various food establishments, she also suffers from frequent
abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. It would, therefore, be
difficult to pinpoint a date for this particular traceback.
In June, unpasteurized orange juice processed
from orange juice concentrate received from Mexico was implicated
in cases of SM infections in Washington, Oregon, and California.
Epidemiologic techniques identified the commercially distributed
unpasteurized orange juice as the primary vector of these infections
shortly before any Utah cases arose. As of June 25, 1999, the
U.S. distributor recalled all non-pasteurized orange juice in
commercial channels and halted any further distribution of the
product. Nonetheless, several Utahns consumed the contaminated
product before the recall. To date, seven confirmed SM cases
have matched the orange juice-associated strain through PFGE
analysis. The results are pending for two other SM cases. Nonetheless,
eight of the nine cases have confirmed orange juice consumption
during the three days prior to the onset of symptoms.
It is hopeful that through the cooperative
efforts of the state and local health departments, the Utah
Department of Agriculture and Food, the Utah poultry industry
and commercial food establishments, that these outbreaks can
be controlled. Medical doctors can assist in this effort by
maintaining a high level of suspicion of salmonella in patients
presenting with diarrhea and fever. Stool cultures should be
performed and positive test results should be promptly reported
to state or local health department officials.
Return
to Index
Hepatitis
A: Testing of the Acutely Ill Patient
Recently the Bureau of Epidemiology
received several hepatitis A reports on patients positive for
hepatitis A total antibody. This type of result indicates that
a person has been infected with hepatitis A at some point in
time. It is, however, impossible to tell from this type of result,
whether or not a person is acutely ill with hepatitis A. For
this purpose, it is necessary to test a person for hepatitis
A antibody IgM. For most laboratories it is standard protocol
to follow up any positive total antibody result with an IgM
antibody test. Other laboratories will only run an IgM antibody
test if it is specifically ordered by the healthcare provider.
It is recommended that any provider ordering an acute hepatitis
panel on a patient, verify what tests will actually be run,
and if necessary, specify that an IgM antibody test be run for
hepatitis A.
Return
to Index
Work-Related
Burn Surveillance In Utah, 1997
Work-related
burns are the leading cause of injury in the United States.
Approximately 1.4 million persons in the United States sustain
burns each year, of which approximately 54,000 to 84,000 are
hospitalized. In Utah, 10,352 work-related burns (thermal and
chemical) were reported to the Industrial Accident Division
of the Utah Labor Commission between 1992 and 1995. Approximately
20 percent of all serious burns in Utah requiring hospitalization
were work-related during this time period.
In 1997, the Environmental Epidemiology Program
of the Utah Department of Health received a grant from the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH) to develop and maintain a registry
of work-related burn cases in Utah, and to use the information
from cases to develop and implement intervention activities.
Interventions include education and consultation to employees
where burn hazards occur, education for cases and workers, broader
industry-wide studies, and research.
The Environmental Epidemiology Program examined
the incidence of hospital admissions attributed to work-related
burns that occurred in the state of Utah in 1997 through the
review of hospital discharge data. This data was received by
the Utah Department of Health, Bureau of Epidemiology under
the authority of the Utah Injury Reporting Rule (R386-703).
During 1997, hospitals throughout Utah reported 699 hospital
admissions that were attributed to burns. Of these reported
burn-related injuries, 133 cases were occupationally-related
and 436 were non-occupational. In addition, there were three
mortality cases attributed to work-related burns. Records were
also abstracted when necessary and each record was reviewed
to eliminate duplications.
The results of this evaluation suggest that
the incidence for work-related burns was significantly higher
among males than females. Of the 133 work-related burn injuries
reported, males accounted for 82 percent of the injuries in
contrast to females who accounted for 18 percent of the injuries
(Table 1).
|
Table1. Crude incidence
rates of occupational (Occ.) burn injury cases, total number
of occupational burns, total number of burns, and percent
of total number of occupational burns in Utah by sex during
1997.
|
BURN INJURIES IN UTAH BY SEX, 1997
|
SEX
|
INCIDENCE OF OCC. BURNS
|
TOTAL NO. OF OCC. BURNS
|
TOTAL
NO. OF BURNS
|
% FROM TOTAL NO. OF OCC. BURNS
|
|
FEMALE
|
5.3
|
24
|
148
|
18.0
|
|
MALE
|
*19.6
|
109
|
288
|
82.0
|
|
BOTH SEXES
|
13.2
|
133**
|
436**
|
100.0
|
Crude incidence
rates are calculated per 100,000 population based on
Utahs 1997 total workforce population.
*Statistically significantly different from female rates.
Data Source: Burn injury data was obtained from the
Utah Department of Health, Bureau of Epidemiology from
Databases of Hospital Admissions and Discharge Data
under the authority of the Utah Injury Reporting Rule
(R386-703).
**There is a variation in agreement of data sets between
total number of cases by age group and total number
of cases by county and by sex due to incomplete records
for the selection criteria.
|
Relative
to age groups, workers who were 25 - 44 years of age accounted
for 60 percent of all work-related burns (Table 2). Seven
percent of the work-related burns occurred among workers less
than 19 years of age. Four-fifths of the injuries reported occurred
in the work force less than 45 years of age. Salt Lake County
accounted for 45 percent of the total workforce population and
was the largest contributor to work-related burns accounting
for almost two-thirds of the injuries. Approximately 22 percent
of the Utah work-related burns occurred in Salt Lake City residents,
10 percent in West Valley residents and seven percent were contributed
by residents of both the cities of Murray and West Jordan, respectively.
These four cities in Salt Lake County accounted for almost 50
percent of all the work-related burns in Utah. Statewide, Davis
(8.3), Tooele (6.8), Utah (4.5) and Weber (4.5) Counties acounted
for 24 percent of the work-related burn injuries (Table 3).
|
Table 2. Crude incidence
rates of occupational (Occ.) burn injury cases, total number
of occupational burns, total number of burns, and percent
of total number of burns in Utah by age-specific groups
during 1997.
|
BURN
INJURIES IN UTAH BY AGE GROUPS, 1997
|
1997
AGE GROUP
|
INCIDENCE OF OCC. BURNS
|
TOTAL NO. OF OCC. BURNS
|
TOTAL
NO. OF BURNS
|
PERCENT
OF ALL
OCC. BURNS
|
|
15 - 19
|
10.6
|
10
|
49
|
7.6
|
|
20 - 24
|
9.8
|
15
|
46
|
11.4
|
|
25 - 34
|
16.3
|
39
|
99
|
29.5
|
|
35 - 44
|
16.3
|
40
|
104
|
30.3
|
|
45 - 54
|
10.2
|
18
|
60
|
13.6
|
|
55 - 64
|
9.5
|
7
|
35
|
5.3
|
|
65 +
|
12.0
|
3
|
40
|
2.3
|
|
All Groups
|
13.2
|
132*
|
433*
|
100.0
|
Age-specific crude
incidence rates are calculated per 100,000 population
based on Utahs age-specific total workforce
population for 1997. Data Source: Burn injury data was
obtained from the Utah Department of Health, Bureau
of Epidemiology from Databases of Hospital Admissions
and Discharge Data under the authority of the Utah Injury
Reporting Rule (R386-703).
* There is a variation in agreement of data sets between
total number of cases by age group and total number
of cases by county and by sex due to incomplete records
for the selection criteria.
|
|
Table 3. Crude incidence
(Inc.) rates of occupational (Occ.) burn injury cases,
total number of occupational burns, total number of burns,
and percent of total number of burns in Utah by county
during 1997.
|
BURN INJURIES IN UTAH BY COUNTY, 1997
|
COUNTY
|
Inc.
of Occ. Burns
|
No.
of Occ. Burns
|
Total
No. of Burns
|
% of All Occ. Burns
|
COUNTY
|
Inc.
of Occ. Burns
|
No.
of Occ. Burns
|
Total
No. of Burns
|
% of
All Occ. Burns
|
|
Beaver
|
0.0
|
0
|
0
|
0.0
|
Piute
|
0.0
|
0
|
0
|
0.0
|
|
Box Elder
|
5.7
|
1
|
1
|
0.8
|
Rich
|
226.2
|
2
|
2
|
1.5
|
|
Cache
|
0.0
|
0
|
11
|
0.0
|
Salt Lake
|
18.6
|
84
|
262
|
63.2
|
|
Carbon
|
11.2
|
1
|
4
|
0.8
|
San Juan
|
0.0
|
0
|
2
|
0.0
|
|
Daggett
|
0.0
|
0
|
0
|
0.0
|
Sanpete
|
12.7
|
1
|
2
|
0.8
|
|
Davis
|
10.4
|
11
|
29
|
8.3
|
Sevier
|
0.0
|
0
|
4
|
0.0
|
|
Duchesne
|
37.3
|
2
|
4
|
1.5
|
Summit
|
8.0
|
1
|
7
|
0.8
|
|
Emery
|
52.4
|
2
|
4
|
1.5
|
Tooele
|
81.7
|
9
|
23
|
6.8
|
|
Garfield
|
0.0
|
0
|
0
|
0.0
|
Uintah
|
41.1
|
4
|
10
|
3.0
|
|
Grand
|
20.9
|
1
|
2
|
0.8
|
Utah
|
4.0
|
6
|
24
|
4.5
|
|
Iron
|
7.4
|
1
|
2
|
0.8
|
Wasatch
|
0.0
|
0
|
1
|
0.0
|
|
Juab
|
0.0
|
0
|
1
|
0.0
|
Wash.
|
3.0
|
1
|
6
|
0.8
|
|
Kane
|
0.0
|
0
|
1
|
0.0
|
Wayne
|
0.0
|
0
|
0
|
0.0
|
|
Millard
|
0.0
|
0
|
2
|
0.0
|
Weber
|
6.6
|
6
|
32
|
4.5
|
|
Morgan
|
0.0
|
0
|
0
|
0.0
|
State of Utah
|
13.2
|
133*
|
436*
|
100.0
|
Crude
incidence rates are calculated per 100,000 population
based on specific countys 1997 total workforce
population. Data Source: Burn injury data was obtained
from the Utah Department of Health, Bureau of Epidemiology
from Databases of Hospital Admissions and Discharge
Data under the authority of the Utah Injury Reporting
Rule (R386-703).
* There is a variation in agreement of data sets between
total number of cases by age group and total number
of cases by county and by sex due to incomplete records
for the selection criteria.
|
Return to Index
Utah Department
of Health, Bureau of Epidemiology
Monthly Morbidity Summary - July 1999 - Provisional
Data

The Epidemiology Newsletter is published monthly by
the Utah Department of Health, Division of Epidemiology and
Laboratory Services, Bureau of Epidemiology, to disseminate
epidemiologic information to the health care professional and
the general public.
Send comments to: The Bureau of Epidemiology. Box 142104,
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-2104, or call (801) 538-6191
Approval 8000008: Appropriation 3705
Rod Betit, Executive Director, Utah Department of Health
Charles Brokopp, Dr.P.H., Division of Epidemiology and Laboratory
Services
Craig R Nichols, MPA, Editor, State Epidemiologist, Director
Bureau of Epidemiology
Cristie Chesler, BA, Managing Editor
Return to Index
|