|
Secondary
Occupational Lead Exposure to Children
Lead has been recognized as an
environmental toxin since antiquity. In fact, lead poisoning is regarded as one of the
earliest occupational diseases. Child lead poisoning can occur from exposure to
environmental lead, lead based paint or as a consequence of secondary occupational lead
exposure. Childhood lead poisoning was first recognized as a separate entity at the turn
of the 20th century. During the 1960s, lead poisoning was increasingly recognized as an
important pediatric public health problem in larger United States cities. Most of the
effort was and continues to be directed towards environmental and lead based paint
sources. However, occupational carry- home of lead may also be a source of child blood
lead poisoning. Researchers found that lead contaminated dust and other materials may be
inadvertently imported home on clothing, shoes, hands, or hair of an adult who has an
occupation that is associated with lead. Adults who are unaware of that risk may play with
children before changing clothes or showering. In addition, lead can drop off the
adults clothing and person onto the surfaces of the home where children can be
exposed.
In October 1996, a 15-month-old male child residing
in Salt Lake County was reported to the Bureau of Epidemiology, Child Blood Lead
Epidemiology and Surveillance (CBLES) Project with a presumptive elevated blood lead test.
That test was confirmed a week later with a venous blood lead level of 30.6 µg/dL. The
Bureau of Epidemiology, Adult Blood Lead Epidemiology and Surveillance (ABLES) Project
also received a report of an elevated blood lead level of 44.7 µg/dL on the father of the
child. The reports on the child were forwarded to the Salt Lake City /County Health
Department who conducted nursing and environmental surveillance intervention. Salt Lake
City/ County Health Department conducted an environmental risk inspection of the home and
found that the child lived in an apartment that was built after the discontinuance of the
use of lead-based paint. The home was clean and in good repair and maintenance. No lead
based paint was found using X-ray fluorescence technology. There were no environmental
sources of lead identified. The inspector noticed traces of grease in the carpet and took
a wipe sample of the carpet. Those samples were tested and found to have 60 µg of lead
per square foot. The bureau conducted occupational and child risk assessment surveys with
the father. Neither the father or mother participated in any hobbies or home activities
that used lead. However, the father was employed at a radiator repair shop where he used
lead and lead solder as part of his work. No precautions were taken at his work to protect
him from lead exposure. The father had not received any training concerning the dangers of
lead exposure.
"Child lead poisoning can
occur from exposure to environmental lead, lead based paint or as a consequence of
secondary occupational lead exposure." |
The childs pediatrician was
interviewed by bureau staff. The physician reported that the child had come for a routine
checkup. Because the checkup was funded by Medicaid, the physician had performed the
initial blood lead screen. The physician reported that the child did not have any signs or
symptoms that would suggest an elevated blood lead level.
The ABLES project was started in 1992 and the CBLES
project was started in January 1996. Data obtained by surveillance under the ABLES project
indicate that 37% of adults reported to the bureau with blood lead levels > 25
µg/dL have children living at home who are under six years of age. The Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that all children under six years of age
be tested annually for lead poisoning. That is particularly important if the child lives
in an environment where they could be exposed to lead such as homes built before 1972,
near environmental lead sources, or have parents or other adults in their home who work in
lead related industries.
The Bureau of Epidemiology insures that children
with elevated blood lead levels receive appropriate intervention. The bureau does that by
referral to local health departments for nutritional and environmental counseling,
providing information to the childs parents or guardians about childhood blood lead
poisoning and blood lead poisoning prevention, and coordinating environmental surveillance
of the childs home. The bureau also assists adults with elevated blood lead levels
by providing them with information about ways of lowering their blood lead levels and by
providing their employers with information about the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration lead standard.
Antimicrobial
Chemoprophylaxis For The Prevention of Meningocococcal Disease
Updated recommendations for the control and
prevention of meningococcal disease were recently published in the Morbidity and
Mortality Weekly Report, Recommendations and Reports, February 14, 1997/Vol. 46/
No. RR-5. In this report, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
updated the schedule for administering chemoprophylaxis. The following information has
been abstracted from the complete report.
Antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis of close contacts of sporadic cases of
meningococcal disease is the primary means for prevention of meningococcal disease in the
United States (Table 1). Close contacts include a) household members, b) day care center
contacts, and c) anyone directly exposed to the patients oral secretions (e.g.,
through kissing, mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, endotracheal intubation or endotracheal
tube management). The attack rate for household contacts exposed to patients who have
sporadic meningococcal disease has been estimated to be four cases per 1,000 persons
exposed, which is 500-800 times greater than for the total population. Because the rate of
secondary disease for close contacts is highest during the first few days after onset of
disease in the primary patient, antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis should be administered as
soon as possible (ideally within 24 hours after the case is identified). Conversely,
chemoprophylaxis administered >14 days after onset of illness in the index case-patient
is probably of limited or no value. Oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal cultures are not
helpful in determining the need for chemoprophylaxis and may unnecessarily delay
institution of this preventive measure.
Rifampin is administered twice daily for 2 days (600 mg every 12 hours
for adults, 10 mg/kg of body weight every 12 hours for children > 1 month of
age, and 5 mg/kg every 12 hours for infants < 1 month of age). Rifampin is effective in
eradicating nasopharyngeal carriage of N. meningitidis. Rifampin is not
recommended for pregnant women, because the drug is teratogenic in laboratory animals.
Rifampin changes the color of urine to reddish-orange and is excreted in tears and other
body fluids; it may cause permanent discoloration of soft contact lenses. Because the
reliability of oral contraceptives may be affected by rifampin therapy, consideration
should be given to using alternate contraceptive measures while rifampin is being
administered.
In addition to rifampin, other antimicrobial agents are effective in
reducing nasopharyngeal carriage of N. meningitidis. Ciprofloxacin in various
dosage regimens is >90% effective in eradicating nasopharyngeal carriage. A single
500-mg oral dose of ciprofloxacin is a reasonable alternative to the multidose rifampin
regimen. Ciprofloxacin levels in nasal secretions far exceed the MIC90 for N.
meningitidis following oral dosing. Ciprofloxacin is not generally recommended for
persons < 18 years of age or for pregnant and lactating women because the drug causes
cartilage damage in immature laboratory animals. However, a recent international consensus
report has concluded that ciprofloxacin can be used for chemoprophylaxis of children when
no acceptable alternative therapy is available.
When ceftriaxone was administered in a single parenteral dose (an
intramuscular dose of 125 mg for children and 250 mg for adults), it was 97%-100%
effective in eradicating pharyngeal carriage of N. meningitidis. Thus, ceftriaxone
(diluted in 1% lidocaine to reduce local pain after injection) is also a reasonable
alternative for chemoprophylaxis.
Systemic antimicrobial therapy of meningococcal disease with agents
other than ceftriaxone or other third-generation cephalosporins may not reliably eradicate
nasopharyngeal carriage of N. meningitidis. If other agents have been used for
treatment, the index patient should receive chemoprophylactic antibiotics for eradication
of nasopharyngeal carriage before being discharged from the hospital.
CONCLUSIONS
N. meningitidis is the leading cause of bacterial meningitis in
older children and young adults in the United States. The quadrivalent A, C, Y, and W-135
meningococcal vaccine available in the United States is recommended for control of
serogroup C meningococcal disease outbreaks and for use among certain high-risk groups,
including a) persons who have terminal complement deficiencies, b) persons who have
anatomic or functional asplenia, and c) laboratory personnel who routinely are exposed to N.
meningitidis in solutions that may be aerosolized. Vaccination also may benefit
travelers to countries in which disease is hyperendemic or epidemic. Conjugate serogroup A
and C meningococcal vaccines are being developed by using methods similar to those used
for H. influenzae type B conjugate vaccines, and the efficacies of several
experimental serogroup B meningococcal vaccines have been documented in older children and
young adults.
Antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis of close contacts of patients who have
sporadic cases of meningococcal disease is the primary means for prevention of
meningococcal disease in the United States. Rifampin has been the drug of choice for
chemoprophylaxis; however, data from recent studies document that single doses of
ciprofloxacin or ceftriaxone are reasonable alternatives to the multidose rifampin regimen
for chemoprophylaxis.
| TABLE 1: Schedule for administering
chemoprophylaxis against meningococcal disease |
Duration & route
Drug Age group Dosage of administration*
Rifampin Children < 1 mo 5 mg/kg every 12 hrs 2 days
Children > 1 mo 10 mg/kg every 12 hrs 2 days
Adults 600 mg every 12 hrs 2 days
Ciprofloxacin Adults 500 mg single dose
Ceftriaxone Children < 15 yrs 125 mg single IM1 dose
Ceftriaxone Adults 250 mg single IM dose |
*Oral administration unless indicated
otherwise
1 Intramuscular. |
Rohypnol
- "Watch Your Drink"
Rohypnol (flunitrazepam) is a prescription
sleeping aid that is part of a widely used class of prescription medications known as
benzodiazepines. Recently there have been increasing reports of rohypnol being illegally
diverted into the United States and used in women's drinks as a prelude to rape. At
sufficient doses amnesia may occur with rohypnol use, which means that the victim may not
remember the circumstances surrounding the rape and may not be in a position to identify
the perpetrator. Rohypnol is manufactured abroad and is most likely being smuggled in from
Mexico and Latin America. Although the majority of sexual assaults associated with this
drug have occurred in Texas, Florida, and California, cases have also occurred throughout
the nation.
Rohypnol is being added to drinks in order to sedate women and sexually
assault them. Because this substance is colorless, tasteless, odorless and easily
dissolved women may be unaware of its presence in their drink. Although overdose from
rohypnol alone has not proved to be life-threatening, when mixed with alcohol, narcotics,
or other CNS depressants, it can be lethal. Symptoms of rohypnol effects include:
drowsiness, impaired motor skills, impaired judgment, disinhibition, dizziness, confusion
and amnesia. Because only 10 percent of sexual assault victims report their cases to the
police, and because the drug is known to impair short-term memory, rohypnol events
probably occur more commonly than authorities think.
In an effort to assist law enforcement agencies in identifying victims,
the manufacturer of rohypnol is now offering free testing designed to detect the drug in
urine. Because rohypnol remains in the urine for 60 to 72 hours after ingestion, the
closer to the time of ingestion, the more effective the assay will be in detecting the
drug. Therefore, a urine sample should be taken from the victim immediately to increase
the likelihood that the drug will be detected. Unless the dosage is very high, it is
unlikely that the assay will detect rohypnol in urine collected 72 hours past ingestion.
Increasingly, STD Clinics, OBGYN's, private physicians, hospital
emergency rooms, rape crisis centers and law enforcement agencies have shown interest in
rohypnol and its impact on their clients. For further information regarding access to
testing, contact Hoffmann-LaRoche's toll-free number, 1(800)608-6540. For general
information on rohypnol, please call 1(800)720-1076.
|
Quarterly
Report of Diseases of Low Frequency Year-to-Date
January 1 - March 31,1997
(including a comparison for
same time period 1993 - 1996) |


The Epidemiology Newsletter is published monthly by the
Utah Department of Health, Division of Epidemiology and Laboratory Services, Bureau of
Epidemiology, to disseminate epidemiologic information to the health care professional and
the general public.
Send comments to:
The Bureau of Epidemiology Box 142870 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-2870 or call
(801) 538-6191
Approval 8000008: Appropriation 3705
Rod Betit, Executive Director Utah Department of Health
Charles Brokopp, Dr.P.H. Division of Epidemiology and Laboratory Services
Craig R Nichols, MPA, Editor, State Epidemiologist, Director, Bureau of Epidemiology
Cristie Chesler, BA Managing Editor
|