
New
Surgeon General’s Report
on Secondhand Smoke Confirms Significance
of Utah Indoor Clean Air Act
June
28, 2006
Utah
health advocates said a new U.S.
Surgeon General’s report on
secondhand smoke leaves absolutely
no doubt that secondhand smoke is
a serious health hazard and confirms
the passing of recent amendments
to the Utah Indoor Clean Air Act
banning smoking in all indoor work
and public places, as necessary
to protect everyone’s right
to breathe clean air.
The
Surgeon General’s report,
released today in Washington, DC,
summarizes the scientific evidence
that has led every major public
health organization and scientific
authority to conclude that secondhand
smoke isn’t just an annoyance,
but a serious health hazard. The
report affirms that there is no
longer any scientific debate that
secondhand smoke, which contains
more than 4,000 chemicals, causes
serious diseases, including lung
cancer, heart disease and respiratory
illnesses such as bronchitis and
asthma, and that the only way to
protect everyone from these health
hazards is to completely eliminate
exposure. The report makes it clear
that other approaches, such as smoking
and non-smoking sections and ventilation
technology, do not eliminate exposure
to secondhand smoke.
This
is the most comprehensive scientific
report ever produced on the health
harms of secondhand smoke and marks
the first time the Surgeon General
has issued a report on secondhand
smoke since 1986. Related materials
can be found at www.cdc.gov/tobacco/
“The
Surgeon General’s report is
the most highly respected scientific
authority on smoking and health,
and this report’s conclusion
makes it clear-there is no question
that secondhand smoke causes serious
disease and death,” said Heather
Borski of the Utah Department of
Health’s Tobacco Prevention
and Control Program. “Utah
legislators have done the right
thing by approving a smoke-free
workplace law that protects all
workers and customers from secondhand
smoke. There is no reason why anyone
should have to breathe the toxins
in secondhand smoke while at work
or as a consequence of patronizing
a restaurant, bar or other venue.”
In
addition to Utah, 13 other states,
Washington, DC and Puerto Rico have
passed statewide smoke-free workplace
laws that include restaurants and
bars. The states are: California,
Colorado (effective July 1), Connecticut,
Delaware, Hawaii (effective Nov.
16), Maine, Massachusetts, Montana,
New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island,
Vermont and Washington (the Montana
and Utah laws extend to bars in
2009, while the DC law does so on
January 1, 2007). Two other states
- Florida and Idaho - have smoke-free
laws that exempt only stand-alone
bars. Hundreds of cities and counties
across the United States have also
taken action, as have whole countries
including Ireland, England (effective
2007), Scotland, Uruguay, Norway,
New Zealand, Sweden, Italy, Bhutan
and Bermuda.
The
evidence that smoke-free laws protect
health without harming business
is prevalent in dozens of studies
and hard economic data that have
shown smoke-free laws can actually
have a positive impact. Some of
the strongest evidence comes from
New York City, where a report found
that, in the year after the city’s
comprehensive smoke-free law took
effect March 30, 2003, business
receipts for restaurants and bars
increased, employment rose, the
number of liquor licenses increased,
virtually all establishments are
complying with the law, and the
vast majority of New Yorkers support
the law. There is also growing evidence
that smoke-free laws can save money.
A study released in August 2005
by the Society of Actuaries found
that secondhand smoke costs our
country $10 billion a year in health
care bills, lost wages and other
costs.
A
fact sheet on the evidence that
smoke-free laws do not harm business
can be found at: www.tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/pdf/0144.pdf
#
# #
|